|
COMMON COUNCIL MINUTES
February 4, 2002
Approved March 4, 2002
The Common Council of the City of West Lafayette,
Indiana met in the Council Chambers at City Hall on February 4, 2002
at the hour of 7:30 p.m.
Mayor Margerum, who presided, called the meeting
to order.
Clerk-Treasurer Rhodes called the roll:
PRESENT: KEEN, MILLS, O'CALLAGHAN, SATTERLY, SPARBY, WINDLER
ABSENT: COHEN
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Bauman, WWTU Director
Darter, Police Chief Marvin, Fire Chief Ford, Director of
Development Andrew, City Engineer Snyder, Street Commissioner
Downey, and Parks Superintendent Payne.
The Pledge of Allegiance was repeated.
MINUTES
Councilor Sparby moved to approve the minutes of
the January 3, 2002 Pre-Council Meeting
and the January 7, 2002 Common Council
Meeting as distributed. Motion was seconded by Councilor
Satterly and passed viva-voce.
COMMITTEE STANDING REPORTS
Street and Sanitation: Councilor Satterly
presented this report.
The monthly highlights, Lindberg Road work is
progressing. There is no thru traffic on Lindberg Road. The road is
open from McCormick to Kestral. The University Farm's mixed paper
and cardboard drop off has been moved from Dubois Street to the
baseball field parking lot on LaGrange Street. The weekend of
February 16 is the next weekend for the drop off. Construction on
the east wing of the Street Department building is 70% complete. The
Rose Street Curb & Sidewalk renovation is to start in the spring of
2002. The Street Resurfacing Project for 2002 has been advertised
and bids are to be opened in February, this month.
Planning and Zoning: Councilor Mills
presented this report.
I have one item. The Community Issues Committee
will meet on February the 19th, at McCutcheon Hall, on
the Purdue Campus, 7:00 p.m. Ken Burns and Michelle White will give
us a little update on Purdue development.
Public Safety: Councilor Keen presented
this report.
For the month of January, the West Lafayette Fire
Department answered a total of 113 calls, which was about the same
over the month previous. For the same time period, the West
Lafayette Police Department answered a total of 1,712 calls, which
was up about 20% actually. We're also going to have two reports
tonight, one of which will be an update on the West Lafayette Police
Station. But, before that, we are going to have a very special
report by the Mayor.
Mayor Margerum said well, I have a special
commendation that I would like to make to Officer Jaime. On Tuesday,
January 8, at approximately 6:10, you were dispatched to 2550 Yeager
Road for a medical assist and you were advised that a pregnant
female subject's water had broken. When you arrived at the location
you found that she had delivered the baby but the baby had an
obstructed airway and was not breathing. You remained calm and,
through using your training, you were able to clear the baby's
airway and the baby started breathing. I would like to commend you,
and Chief Marvin joins me and I know the Council, in commending your
efforts while responding to and handling this call. Clearly, your
efforts saved the life of a newborn baby. The Chief has talked with
the mother and she indicated that the baby is doing well and West
Lafayette citizens should be very proud of your professional,
dedicated manner in which you responded to this call. So, thank you
for serving the Department, and congratulations, and thanks again.
[Applause]
Mayor Margerum said the next item is Bob Bauman
and Tom Gall will present an update on the Police Station.
City Attorney Bauman said we felt that it was
probably appropriate to update the Council on the progress of the
Police Station because we're going to be asking the Council to take
some action beginning next month to enable this project to move
forward. So, we'd like to review briefly the history of the project,
the design of the Police Station, and the process and schedule that
will follow from here on out. This is City Hall. It was completed in
1972, has a total of 17,600 square feet, and the Police Department
in the lower level has approximately 6,385 square feet and Scott
Snyder [City Engineer Snyder] pointed out to me today that a lot of
times that space in City Hall is not entirely usable for offices or
specific functions. During that period of time, the population of
the City has grown from approximately 19,000 to over 28,000 and also
during that period of time the number of employees in the Police
Department has grown from 28 to 60. Now, while some of these
employees are on the street, all of those employees are ones who
have activities which require them to be and do certain things at
the Department on a daily basis. So, the space and the facilities
they have to work with are very important. The situation was
addressed on a temporary basis with the addition of the temporary
building in 1999, which increased the space to 7,500 square feet and
there was an additional 2,100 square feet, which is in use in off
site storage. That temporary building was used for storage, showers,
and a squad room. So, I think from the growth of the Department the
need for a new facility is something that is fairly clear and to
work on this the Mayor appointed a study committee in 2000. Members
Dick Bossung, a former City Council Member, current Council Member
Gil Satterly, Sandy Allende, Lee Trachtman, Regina Becker, Councilor
Gerry Keen, Chief Dan Marvin, and Deputy Chief Chris Leroux. They
reviewed the current status, assessed future needs. A Construction
Manager, Tom Gall, was brought on board and after that there was a
process including a request for qualifications and interviews that
lead to the hiring of an architect, which was RQAW, and then they
began a design process. Tom, do you want to go ahead and take it at
this point? And then, we'll come back and talk about some of the
rest of the process for getting the building built.
Mr. Gall said basically, we started the design
process and we had some primary goals, was to design a facility that
would meet the need for the next 25 years, to do it cost effectively
with financing that would not involve a tax increase, and to deal
with some practical transition issues from the existing facility to
the new facility. We had some budget constraints as well, a
construction budget, which includes furnishings, phone systems, as
well as exercise equipment and moving into the facility of $5.5
million. The decision to expand the existing site to share some of
the existing infrastructure, which dovetails into utilizing the
existing dispatch center. That's a savings of about a million
dollars in the project and, as we understand it, there's a good
chance that the dispatch center won't be needed in the near future
and to spend that kind of money in the new facility and not have it
available to add square footage to the facility didn't seem like the
right thing to do, which had an awful lot to do with why the site
was selected. The design process is basically in four phases.
Strategic planning, RQAW came in and did a very early piece of work
to help us determine roughly how big it would need to be and if it
would fit on the site as we had envisioned it, on into space
programming, conceptual design and then where we are today in final
construction documents. Strategic planning, the basis for this was
to identify the components, analyze growth project system factors,
analyze component organization and operation, review/summarize
existing spatial conditions, develop space standards, analyze
existing parking, analyze potential sites and find the buildable
area. In other words, what happened here is RQAW used their
expertise to look at what we had, what we were doing, how much space
we were doing it in and determine how much space we should be doing
it in. That amounted to essentially saying that we're in a little
over 7,000 square feet. They should be in about 19,000 square feet
to meet the need currently today. The next step is to do space
programming, to define the general philosophies of the operation,
determine specific goals and policies, define how the workstations
should lay out in each individual room, summarize the Department
staffing needs, develop some parking projections, define detailed
component space needs, identify adjacencies, proximities (what
operations need to be next to what operations), identify
technologies (records, computer needs), develop an operational
security plan, and prepare detailed program document. In the
conceptual design, we worked to develop overall occupancy scenarios.
In other words, was it going to be a one story building, two story,
three story, basement plus two stories? Those kinds of ideas were
developed. Worked with the site plans, determined what systems would
be used, do an image study to study the buildings in the surrounding
area to try and develop a new building that would fit in the area,
prepare conceptual cost estimates, and develop an anticipated
project schedule. I think I'd go back on the conceptual design. One
of the things that was done, a good example would be the workout
facility. Had we done it in a two story building, it would have
probably wound up on the second floor, which leads to some
interesting construction and some interesting issues with weights
being dropped on the floor and creating a lot of noise for people
underneath it. That was one of the reasons that we wound up with a
basement and a two story structure above it. So that uses like that
could wind up in an area where they didn't cause difficulties for
the rest of the building. Getting into the budget issues, following
conceptual design the new building was priced and the pricing that
we received at that point exceeded the budget that we had decided we
could work with. So, we stopped for a period of time, looked at the
materials that the building was being built out of and some of the
systems that were being used, and, with a goal of not making the
building smaller but staying within the budget, came back and did
develop a budget that is within the constraints. One of the ways we
did that was we used a different exterior panel. This building has a
concrete panel exterior. There are many different types of panels to
use. The panel that's represented on that rendering there is a
significantly less expensive panel than was originally
conceptualized by the architectural firm. Several things like that
were done and we were able to save a significant amount of money on
the budget. We're now into the final construction document phase.
That phase is about 98% to 99% complete. We're at a point where what
we've done is turn all of the conceptual plans and thoughts into
final construction plans and specifications. One of the last things
that we've done here is do a final room by room review with
revisions and approval by the Police Department. Site drainage plans
have been submitted for the building and the Salisbury parking lot.
Stormwater drainage issues have been solved by utilizing underground
storage for the Police building itself. That system is on the main
site. In the Salisbury area we have an existing situation that's
been existing for a long time where the back yards of those
neighbors have been flooding. That water never did have a place to
go. With the plan for that lot, it does. It will have its own
drainage structures. The water will be taken off their lots, put
into a drainage structure and out into the City drainage, whereas
the lot itself will store its own water and release it out into the
street. That was something that was brought up by a neighborhood
concern at one of the very first neighborhood meetings that we had,
to make sure that when we got done that drainage problem was taken
care of. This is a site plan showing the new Police Department and
its adjacency to City Hall and its surrounding new parking. This is
the first floor of the building and we do have floor plans back here
so afterwards, if you want to stop and look through them and ask
questions, we will be around for that. The first floor of the Police
Station, which involves a lot of the administrative functions as
well as, on the right hand side of this picture, a four car sally
port for bringing in of prisoners, entering them into the system,
and for minor maintenance on the cars such as lights or the
attachment of electronic equipment, not for major maintenance, oil
changes or things of that nature. The building hasn't been designed
for that use. The second floor, more of the Police functions,
detectives' areas, interview areas, soft and hard interviews, and
all of these spaces are designed through the year 2025. When they
move into this building there will be significant space for
expansion. This is the lower level, which involves a lab and the
evidence areas, locker rooms, workout rooms, mechanical spaces, and
to the left of this you see an alternate area for a basement that
would extend all of the way to the east, which would at this point
be storage and future expansion of the building. It is being priced
as an alternate so that the determination can be made to add it or
not after the bids are received. You notice the space to the right
is an area that is at grade. We are looking at the basement now, so
that area is where the cars come into the garage above it. This is
the rendering of the new Police Station. It matches the real one
that you can see to the right of it. There have been several issues
to deal with. We've had to acquire the site, make sure the building
site would work. We've had to deal with the issue of additional
parking. We have gone through the process of doing a Planned
Development to unify all of the City's properties and to deal
specifically with the issues of drainage, landscape, traffic, and
utilities. The site acquisition involved surveys of the properties
to purchase, appraisals, an offer and financing, which is an EDIT
additional appropriation, is closing this month. The issue of
additional parking was a concern from the beginning and RQAW did a
study and we also, of course, leaned on the Unified Zoning Ordinance
such that the Planned Development that was done met the Unified
Zoning Ordinance parking requirements. The Salisbury Street parking
lot that has been designed is almost finished as well. It was
specifically designed to leave the existing large trees in place. We
could have gotten more parking on that space. It seemed like it was
important, though, to save those trees. They are large, very mature
trees. The landscaping was required to have a significant buffer
between the residential areas and this commercial space. Again, the
drainage requirements, to solve an existing neighbors drainage
issue, and that has been done and it meets traffic engineering
standards. I'll let Bob have it.
City Attorney Bauman said in financing goals for
this project, the number one was to avoid a tax increase. The second
was to avoid adverse impact to other City activities and the third
was to try to be as cost effective as possible with a low interest
rate. The plan then involved keeping the building construction cost
to $5.5 million and, as Tom discussed a moment ago, that involved
going back and doing some design work at one point to make sure that
we did that. The other land acquisition and site cost will come from
City capital funds that have been saved rather than borrowing. In
order to avoid a tax increase, we use existing Economic Development
Income Tax, EDIT funds, to make the payments on the bonds. In order
to keep the interest rate as low as possible, we'll be requesting a
property tax backup. That will allow us, the rule of thumb they say
is that is at least a 25 basis points savings on the interest rates.
The steps for the financing would be a petition by 50 taxpayers for
this kind of financing. We'll advertise for construction bids. The
Mayor will amend the EDIT plan. We'll be requesting next month that
the Council make a finding of need for this project and a pledge of
the EDIT revenue. At a point in the future, we'll have a hearing on
the lease and appoint appraisers. Those appraisers will set the
price for the City to sell the land to a leasing corporation for
construction of the building and approval of bond anticipation
notes. There will also be a Local Government Tax Control Board
hearing. The Council will appropriate the land payment from the
leasing corporation. We anticipate that that money would be recycled
back into this project. Bids will be received and analyzed. Then
there will be notice of execution a lease. The leasing corporation
will approve the borrowing, the trust indenture, the official
statement and the BANs. Close on the BANs. Execute the lease. Begin
construction. The final bond sale will be closed. It will be under
construction this year and into next year and, after it is
completed, payments can begin. This is a relatively complex project
involving various design elements, the purchase of additional land
both for the building itself and for the additional parking. It has
involved a Planned Development. The financing considerations. The
budget constraints we're working with. Even after the project has
begun, like all construction projects it will still be weather
dependent, but at this point it is still on virtually the same
schedule as was set last year on the initial planning phase. We hope
to have the contract signed and begin work in April of this year. We
hope to have the building enclosed before winter. That will allow
various interior work to proceed throughout the winter. They'll come
back to site work next spring and by the summer of 2003 we
anticipate that the building would be completed and placed into
service. And if anyone has any questions, we will try to answer
those.
Councilor Sparby said I had a question and I
don't know if you could answer or maybe Dan [Police Chief Marvin].
The workout facility that's in the area in the basement of the
building, is that going to be open to all employees?
Police Chief Marvin said with the security that's
been chosen, we would be able to allow people to have access to
that, to keep that code. So, we could allow other City employees to
have access to that, without even having to bother any of the Police
employees.
Councilor Sparby said because I know the Fire
Department is interested in something like that. Thank you.
Mayor Margerum said thank you very much and, as
you can see, a lot of very careful planning has gone into this and
Dan and the officers have spent many, many hours with the
architects.
City Attorney Bauman said I know that they have
been frustrated that they have needed space for a long time, but I
think the time that's taken to plan it has also resulted in a great
deal of departmental input and hopefully that will get a facility
that will serve them very well over the 25 year life of it.
Mayor Margerum said and I would also like to
thank Dick Bossung and the Committee that has worked on the initial
planning. Thank you very much.
Purdue Relations: No report.
Parks and Recreation: Councilor
O'Callaghan presented this report.
The Park Board met January 28 and the Parks staff
has completed a draft of the Five Year Master Plan. There will be a
Citizen Recreation Advisory Committee meeting on Tuesday, February
12, at 7:00 p.m. right here for additional public input on the
Master Plan, and also a discussion of the University Farm park.
There is a horticulture class at Purdue that will be working on the
design of the park. The next Park Board meeting will be February 25
to accommodate President's Day.
Department of Development: Councilor
O'Callaghan presented this report.
The Redevelopment Commission met on January 17
and they also presented their year end report and discussed the road
to connect Brees Way with the hotel. It will definitely help the
traffic flow and help shoppers who are shopping in Wabash Landing to
be able to get to the parking garage, in case there are no spaces
out front. Certainly there was the exciting announcement about
Borders Bookstore coming. When we met with the youth about
activities that they wanted to see in West Lafayette, they mentioned
a big bookstore. So, they were excited about the possibility of
Borders and they are indeed coming. The next Redevelopment
Commission meeting will be February 7, this week, at noon.
PERSONNEL: No report.
BUDGET AND FINANCE: No report.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT UTILITY: Councilor
Satterly presented this report.
Concerning the treatment of wastewater, the
Treatment Plant personnel are treating the sewage and the statistics
on the treatment are well under the maximums allowed. There was some
overflow during the month of December, at the plant, 1.25 million
gallons. The report is on file in the Clerk-Treasurer's Office.
REPORT OF APC REPRESENTATIVE: No report.
REPORTS OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES:
PUBLIC RELATIONS:
Mayor Margerum said I wanted to just acknowledge
and give my sympathies and that of the Councilors and the City to
the families of Judge Heid and Roger D. Branigin. They were two
great losses to our community, especially from the legal fraternity
and so I just wanted to note that those two gentlemen had passed and
convey our sympathy to the families.
FINANCIAL REPORT:
Councilor Sparby moved that the financial report
be approved as distributed. Motion was seconded by Councilor
Satterly and passed viva-voce.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Ordinance No. 2-02
An Ordinance Providing For Temporary Loans From A Fund Having
Sufficient Balance To A Depleted Fund (Prepared by the
Clerk-Treasurer). Councilor Sparby read the ordinance in part and
moved that Ordinance No. 2-02 be passed on second and final reading
and the vote be by roll call. Motion was seconded by Councilor
Satterly.
Mayor Margerum said is there any discussion?
There was no discussion.
Ordinance No. 2-02 passed second and final
reading, 6-0.
Ordinance No. 5-02
(Amended) An Additional Appropriation (EDIT) (Prepared by
the Clerk-Treasurer) PUBLIC HEARING. Councilor Sparby read the
ordinance in part and moved that Ordinance No. 5-02 (Amended) be
passed on second and final reading and the vote be by roll call.
Motion was seconded by Councilor Satterly.
Mayor Margerum said before we can vote on final
reading, we need to have a public hearing. As you heard this was to
assist the library in purchasing additional space, which would give
them more space and also provide for some public space and
landscaping around the new library. Is there anyone in the audience
who wishes to speak in reference to this ordinance? Seeing no one, I
will close the public meeting. Does anyone have any questions or
comments about the purchase of the space for the library?
Councilor O'Callaghan said just excited about the
possibility.
Mayor Margerum said yes, well, I think it will be
very helpful to both groups.
There was no further discussion.
Ordinance No. 5-02 (Amended) passed second and
final reading, 6-0.
NEW BUSINESS
Ordinance No. 6-02
To Amend Certain Portions Of The Unified Zoning Ordinance Of
Tippecanoe County, Indiana, Designating The Time When The Same Shall
Take Effect (UZO Amendment 26) (Submitted by Area Plan Commission).
Councilor Sparby read the ordinance by title only and moved that
Ordinance No. 6-02 be passed on first and only reading and the vote
be by roll call. Motion was seconded by Councilor Satterly.
Mayor Margerum said Councilor Mills, would you
explain this one, please, as our APC Representative?
Councilor Mills said thank you, Mayor. This is an
amendment to the ordinance to clear up a little bit of the language
as to what constitutes a public utility and this was a result of the
cell phone that was built in downtown Lafayette. So, the language
has been changed so that a public utility is a little bit more well
defined than it was previously.
Mayor Margerum said all right, and this passed
the Area Plan Commission.
Councilor Mills said 13-0.
Mayor Margerum said all right, is there any other
discussion or questions? This is the one and only reading.
There was no further discussion.
Ordinance No. 6-02 passed first and only reading,
6-0.
Ordinance No. 7-02
To Rezone Certain Real Estate Within The City Of West Lafayette,
Indiana And Designating The Time When The Same Shall Take Effect (R1
to NB) (Robert Bouggy/John Folkers) (Submitted by Area Plan
Commission). Councilor Sparby read the ordinance by title only and
moved that Ordinance No. 7-02 be passed on first and only reading
and the vote be by roll call. Motion was seconded by Councilor
Satterly.
Mayor Margerum said Mr. Bumbleburg?
Mr. Joe Bumbleburg [Ball, Eggleston, Bumbleburg,
McBride, Walkey, & Stapleton] said thank you Mayor, members of the
Council. I represent the petitioners in this matter, Dr. Bouggy and
Dr. Folkers, both of whom are present here with us this evening. As
I'm sure all of you are very well aware, the doctors occupy a
building at the corner of Lindberg Road and Northwestern. The office
has been a dentist's office since at least 1964 and the number of
dentists that were there then, two, are the same number of dentists
that are there today. But the site is noncomplying under the zoning
ordinance with regard to parking and what we have here is a system
that is going to try to make the parking situation better. The more
off street parking we can artfully do, the better everyone else will
be. What we are trying to do here is get maximum help for this
corner with a minimum impact on all of the neighbors. What that
amounts to is, on the big drawing, and this is a replica of the one
I know you have in your staff reports, but that spot right there is
the existing office. Here is Lindberg Road. That's Summit. There's
Northwestern here. This property right here, which I will call to
the south, is owned by the doctors also and, quite candidly, if
there was a better way without as much paper as we've generated to
do this, we would have happily done it, except that there are all
kinds of rules about property lines and zone lines and all of those
kinds of crossing inappropriately. So, what we did was we have this
process where, from this point back, that's about 60 feet, by doing
that this lot remains a compliant lot under the zoning ordinance. We
will take about 16 feet off of this lot and add it to that lot and
that will permit us to place 8 fully compliant parking spaces to go
with the 7 spaces that are already in that area. We will have a
planting screen in this area, and pursuant to Section 4-9-5 (c) of
the NUZO we are authorized to deal with the City Engineer. Mr.
Snyder and I have commenced to begin, and we have a draft and I
think we are pretty close to having it completed, that would govern
the activity of this particular parking area. It provides that the
wheel stops would be required and the other kinds of amenities for a
parking space would be appropriate for that particular area. The
benefit to this is, of course, that the parking, which as I
understand on Lindberg Road right here, which is going to disappear
and is currently used by both staff and patients, will to some
degree be replaced by what we have here. In this kind of a
neighborhood what happens is if you don't do that, then you impose
on everybody else. And where would that parking be? Well,
unfortunately, it will be over here on Summit, which would be a
little bit of a walk but it imposes upon a neighborhood and what we
are trying to do is stop that. I grew up in a neighborhood where
there was a public facility that imposed upon the neighbors and it
becomes a source of neighborhood aggravation. So, what we have here
are the doctors trying to take care of this problem in the least
intrusive way that we can. The parking spaces that I indicated right
here are all conforming. We haven't sat down and drawn this little
area here yet, but I have a suspicion that we could put in there
some, what I would call noncompliant, parking spaces. But, I don't
think when you need the 22 foot aisle space like we have here that
we could make those really count under the ordinance. That does not
mean that we won't use that space and the ordinance would not have
any problem with it. It's just that we couldn't count that. So,
hopefully, when we get this all done we will be able to pick up a
couple more there to be able to use in addition and bring this thing
even closer to its compliance. By having the tight screening that we
have here, having the wheel stops, having some screening in that
little area right there, we will have accomplished everything
essentially that the ordinance requires except having a large buffer
strip. The buffer strip would be more appropriate if, in fact, this
lot and this lot didn't have a form of common ownership, which it
does. By the way, the agreement that we've worked out with the City
having to do with this provides that as long as the signatories to
this agreement are the same owners as this property here then the
contract stays in effect and if they were ever to sever those lots,
then this thing would all have to be revisited to see where we are
on it. Like I say, if we could have figured out a way to just do
this on some sort of informal or temporary basis, that might have
been a better solution, but there are none like that in the
ordinance. So, this is best we can do to get into a better situation
for that particular corner. This piece of property is NB, and
certainly has been NB as long as I can remember, and this piece here
has a residential character to it by zoning. Those items will stay
as they are and that's also a good thing for the position that we're
promoting to you as members of the Council. I think with that I will
entertain questions should you have any.
Councilor Windler said have the owners always
owned that second lot there to the south or did they just buy it for
the purposes of additional parking?
Mr. Bumbleburg said well, I'll let John [Folkers]
or Bob [Bouggy], how long have you owned the second lot, gentlemen?
Dr. Bouggy said two years.
Mr. Bumbleburg said they've owned it for two
years.
Councilor Keen said do you know what the square
footage of the south lot will be after the rezone, approximately?
Mr. Bumbleburg said no, I don't as a matter of
fact. The lot is 170 feet deep and, I think, 80 feet wide and we are
going to take off of it a piece 16 by about 100.
Councilor Keen said my math isn't that good.
Mr. Bumbleburg said neither is mine.
City Attorney Bauman said you're taking how much
off then?
Mr. Bumbleburg said we are taking about 100 by
16.
Councilor Windler said so, 1,600 square feet.
Mr. Bumbleburg said that's 1,600 square feet,
thank you.
City Attorney Bauman said that would leave about
12,000 square feet, according to my calculation, which is probably
suspect, too.
Mr. Bumbleburg said when you have lawyers doing
engineer kind of work, take your chance.
City Attorney Bauman said that's right.
Mr. Bumbleburg said I say that before [Tom] Gall
does that to us, here, or [Dan] Pusey, even worse.
Councilor Satterly said how is the drainage going
to be arranged for that additional paved area?
Mr. Bumbleburg said well, we'll have to handle
it.
Councilor Satterly said it will drain north?
Mr. Bumbleburg said back onto the other lot. It
will be handled when you put the hard surface in.
Mayor Margerum said are there any other questions
from the Council? Are there any questions or comments from the
audience?
Jim Richardson (1000 Oakhurst Dr.) said I live at
the other end of the block. I'm not here to make a fuss about
things. I guess I did that a couple of weeks ago. What disturbs me
still is in this great spirit of informality, jovialness, and
congeniality, it seems that things somehow will work themselves out.
But, in the distant future when maybe that doesn't obtain, we're
still going to be left, or our successors are going to be left, with
trying to unravel all of the problems. I would feel more comfortable
than I do already, having talked with the doctors and understanding
their desire to be good neighbors and solve their problems and
affecting the rest of the neighborhood who have been there even
longer than the dentist's office, I feel good about that
relationship, but I think it would be helpful to me, at least, if
you folks could give me a sheet of paper that spells out the
resolution of these matters and just exactly what is to be approved
tonight. What precise piece of land is going to be rezoned? Is it
going to be made a part of Lot 18 to the north? Is it going to
remain a part of 17 but a part of 17 rezoned? The drainage is a
problem for people behind. Surely, something must be done, more than
just looked into it. So without trying to raise any hackles, I would
like to hear some of these unresolved issues spelled out, preferably
in black and white.
Mayor Margerum said Mr. Bumbleburg, would you
like to answer that?
Mr. Bumbleburg said for Mr. Richardson and
members of the Council, as a paperwork process what will happen
tonight, if you approve our request, is that little piece right
there will be rezoned, and only that little piece. All of the rest
of the property stays as it is right now. So, that piece will stay
that way. It will then be severed from the south lot by an Exemption
E transaction, and transferred to the north lot, and made a part of
the north lot. Again, I pointed out a minute ago that if there was
another way to do that, we would be happy to do it. But, that's the
only way under the zoning code that we can make this thing adhere to
what the code says. So, that's what will happen, an Exemption E
transfer of that piece, what Mr. Bauman calculated a minute ago
about 1,600 square feet, to the other lot. The remaining parts of
the paperwork stream, if you will, first of all that will require a
deed and that will be a matter of public record and then there will
also be the agreement pursuant to 5-9-5 (c), which will be a
document executed pursuant to the code by the owners and accepted by
the West Lafayette City Engineer under the statutory powers granted
to him when the zoning ordinance was passed. So, there will be a
perfectly good paper trail. Nearly all of this one would be
recorded, because I think the City, I suspect Mr. Bauman would be a
lot more comfortable if the 4-9-5 agreement was also recorded and I
think probably I would be more comfortable with that, too, from just
a title situation. So, there's going to be a perfect paper trail on
this, or as perfect as we can make.
Mayor Margerum does that answer your questions
then? Are there any other comments or questions from anyone in the
audience?
Ted Weidner (1820 Summit) said I didn't hear the
concern over drainage addressed. My property corners on the property
being rezoned and where's the water going to go? I didn't hear that
addressed. I'm still not real fond of the split zoning on the
property and, between you and me, sometimes Mr. Bumbleburg just
assumes that you people are all going to go along with him and a lot
of back patting going on, and to us people out here, it doesn't look
real good. I felt almost threatened by Mr. Bumbleburg when he said
we're going to park some cars on your street if you don't do this.
He didn't say those exact words but that's what came across, and I
didn't like it.
Mayor Margerum said the drainage issue, I
believe, is one that will be, as the lot is.
Mr. Bumbleburg said that will be part of the
construction drawings that have to be approved by the Engineer's
Office.
Mayor Margerum said the construction drawings,
Mr. Snyder will have to approve those and they will have to meet the
requirements of the Unified Zoning Ordinance, is that correct,
drainage ordinance?
City Attorney Bauman said the general
requirements of the drainage ordinance is that, if this was approved
and they wanted to build parking there, they would have to show that
the runoff after the parking was constructed would not exceed that
of the pre-development condition. That is, before that hard surface
was added. Typically, that will involve some kind of storage and
metering, often redirection of the flow. Again, those details would
be handled with the City Engineering Department.
Mr. Weidner said so, will this be only looking at
the additional paving or will it be looking at the whole 9 yards,
the additional to what's already there?
City Attorney Bauman said the ordinance would
only apply to the additional.
Mr. Weidner said I think we already have some
runoff.
City Attorney Bauman said well, most places that
there is hard surface, there is, and this ordinance was adopted.
City Engineer Snyder said 1988.
City Attorney Bauman said and anything that was
built before then didn't require any kind of drainage plan. So, yes,
there are situations throughout the City from before the drainage
ordinance where there are issues.
Mayor Margerum said but this is the time to bring
those up, because at least that part of it can be addressed. Are
there any other questions from the audience or from the Council?
Councilor Sparby said Madam Mayor, I had a
question for Joe. Is there going to be some landscaping done or
something to provide a buffer there? I was looking through it and I
didn't see is spelled out in the Area Plan's report.
Mr. Bumbleburg said this area right here is a
planting screen, where the little hash marks are.
Councilor Sparby said OK.
Councilor Keen said it's annotated.
Councilor Mills said you talked about that in
Pre-Council.
Councilor Sparby said is there currently
landscaping between the lots, on the existing Lot 18, I think it is?
Mr. Bumbleburg said this is 17, this is 16.
Councilor Sparby said 16, I'm sorry.
Mr. Bumbleburg said right here?
Councilor Sparby said on the backside, is there
any?
Mr. Bumbleburg said no.
City Attorney Bauman said again, that would be a
situation where these properties were developed before any of those
buffering requirements were in the zoning ordinance.
Councilor Sparby said OK, but that might be
something that the neighbors might appreciate, if they could see fit
to do that at some time, maybe.
Mr. Bumbleburg said it's part of the 4-9-5
agreement with the City.
Councilor Windler said to put in buffering?
Mr. Bumbleburg said to put in, yes, the plant
screening. I would like to quibble with you on the word "buffer"
because under the ordinance a buffer yard is something different
than a screening setback.
Mayor Margerum said are there any other questions
from the Council?
Councilor O'Callaghan said so, in general it
seems to make it better for the neighbors, that it would be more
parking, parking that would be safer, parking that would be off the
street, and something that we think would be an improvement in the
neighborhood.
Councilor Satterly said this staff comments, you
are using Exemption E and they say, "If petitioners chose to forego
the parking. and instead use Exemption E to attach the 16 foot strip
to Lot 16, the remainder of Lot. would not meet the minimum lot
width requirements.."
Mr. Bumbleburg said this staff report was written
before the legal description was amended to take the front 60 feet
off. The original legal description has that whole 16 feet off of
the lot. To meet the staff's comment, the front 60 feet was restored
back and that makes this lot then totally compliant.
Councilor Satterly said OK.
Mr. Bumbleburg said I believe the Councilor knows
that to be true. As the APC rep, you could verify that.
Councilor Mills said that's right. Yes.
Mayor Margerum said any other questions?
There was no further discussion.
Ordinance No. 7-02 passed first and only reading,
6-0.
Ordinance No. 8-02
An Ordinance To Amend The Zoning Ordinance Of Tippecanoe County,
Indiana, To Rezone Certain Real Estate From OR To PDNR (Hentschel
Complex PD) (Submitted by Area Plan Commission). Councilor Sparby
read the ordinance by title only and moved that Ordinance 8-02 be
passed on first and only reading and the vote be by roll call.
Motion was seconded by Councilor Satterly.
Mayor Margerum said this is Marianne Owen's.
Ms. Owen [Stuart & Branigin] said good evening.
Thank you for your comments earlier about Mr. Branigin. I'm here on
behalf of the petitioners, who are the Trustees of Purdue
University, Purdue Research Foundation, and Bionalytical Systems. In
response to Mr. Satterly's question at your Pre-Council Meeting,
I've handed out to you a drawing, which is what was in your packet
but it more clearly demarks the lots being created by this proposal,
as well as shows you clearly in yellow the common area that is going
to now be shared by these property owners, provided that you approve
this request. There will be an association created to oversee the
maintenance and control of that common area. But, what basically
this request is is taking this three building development that was
originally created by one entity to serve various affiliated uses
and allow it to be used by nonaffiliated uses, essentially, and for
the property to be transferred to parties that aren't necessarily
joined with one another. As we mentioned at Pre-Council, because
this was created by a group of parties that were all tied with one
another we had the interesting situation where if you turned off the
water in one building you shut it off in a couple and we also had
situations where everyone was sharing parking. So, now that we are
looking at parties who are not tied with one another and who don't
particularly like when someone else turns off their water. We're
straightening it all out and the Planned Development process is just
the process to do it. Through this we are able to divide the
property, as well as deal with the setback issues that are presented
under the Unified Zoning Ordinance. So, we have worked with
representatives of West Lafayette and the Area Plan Commission staff
to create this what we see as a win-win proposition. So, we just
request your approval of this. I am here with representatives of all
of the petitioners to answer any questions you may have.
Mayor Margerum said what you're asking for is the
rezoning of all four pieces?
Ms. Owen said I'm requesting the rezoning of this
property from OR to Planned Development, and it's actually a Planned
Development Non-Residential.
Councilor O'Callaghan said so, this would
facilitate if someone wanted to purchase one of the properties? It
would make it cleaner and easier to accomplish, is that correct?
Ms. Owen said absolutely. You find quite often
that there are some situations where persons are willing to do this,
but more often than not if they are going to put significant
improvements on a property and a significant investment, say in a
rehabilitation, a renovation, of a building they would want to own
it and so this is going to allow just that.
Mayor Margerum said are there any questions from
any other Councilors? Are there any questions from the audience?
There was no further discussion.
Ordinance No. 8-02 passed first and only reading,
6-0.
Ordinance No. 9-02
An Additional Appropriation (Police, Lindberg/McCormick Road
Improvement Fund) (Prepared by the Clerk-Treasurer). Councilor
Sparby read the ordinance in part and moved that Ordinance No. 9-02
be passed on first reading and the vote be by roll call. Motion was
seconded by Councilor Satterly.
Mayor Margerum said the purpose of this
additional appropriation is for the Police Department to expend a
contribution from Subaru-Isuzu for the West Lafayette Police D.A.R.E.
program, which we appreciate that very much. Also, the
Lindberg/McCormick Road Improvement Fund is to appropriate the INDOT
grant reimbursements, which are expected in 2002, and we want to
have those available when the bills come due. Are there any
questions from the Councilors? Any questions from the audience?
There was no further discussion.
Ordinance No. 9-02 passed first reading, 6-0.
Mayor Margerum said there will have to be a
public hearing before we have the final passage.
Resolution No. 5-02
A Resolution Appropriating Code Enforcement Revolving Fund On Hand
Resulting From Payment Of Inspection Fees From The West Lafayette
Target Area (Submitted by Department of Development). Councilor
Sparby read the resolution in part and moved that Resolution No.
5-02 be passed on first and only reading and the vote be by roll
call. Motion was seconded by Councilor Satterly.
Mayor Margerum said this is a standard quarterly
resolution to appropriate those funds. Are there any questions?
There was no further discussion.
Resolution No. 5-02 passed first and only
reading, 6-0.
Resolution No. 6-02
A Resolution Appropriating Housing Rehabilitation Revolving Loan
Funds On Hand Resulting From Repayments Of Loans Previously Made By
The West Lafayette Housing Authority (Submitted by Department of
Development). Councilor Sparby read the resolution in part and moved
that Resolution No. 6-02 be passed on first and only reading and the
vote be by roll call. Motion was seconded by Councilor Satterly.
Mayor Margerum said this, again, is a quarterly
appropriation for housing rehab funds. Any questions?
There was no further discussion.
Resolution No. 6-02 passed first and only
reading, 6-0.
COMMUNICATIONS
CITIZEN COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business at this time,
Councilor Sparby moved for adjournment. Motion was seconded by
Councilor Keen and passed viva-voce. The time being 8:29 p.m.
Office of the Clerk-Treasurer Judy
Rhodes
|